Objective: This study aimed to determine the ability of healthcare pro
fessionals and lay volunteers to grade photoscreening photographs. Des
ign: The study design was a cross-sectional study. Participants and In
tervention: One hundred children 3 years of age or younger received a
complete ophthalmologic examination and were photographed using the Me
dical Technology Innovations (MTI) photoscreener, Twenty-six children
had normal examination results, and the remaining 74 children had cond
itions that are of interest for pediatric screening, including strabis
mus, refractive error, media opacities, and ptosis. Eighteen volunteer
s, including pediatric ophthalmologists, pediatricians, ophthalmic tec
hnicians, health department nurses, Prevention of Blindness Society pe
rsonnel, and Lions Club volunteers, graded each of the 100 photoscreen
ing photographs. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of
vision screening and of photograph grading were measured. Results: Re
sults from various graders yielded sensitivities ranging from 37% to 8
8% and specificities ranging from 40% to 88%. No single grader achieve
d sensitivity and specificity both greater than 70%. The grading of th
e manufacturer's representative had a sensitivity of 43% and a specifi
city of 85%. Sensitivity decreased to 31% for strabismus and 18% for r
efractive error when the correct type of strabismus or refractive erro
r was required to be considered true-positives. Results were not posit
ively correlated with the ophthalmologic knowledge of the participant.
Conclusions: The wide variability in sensitivities and specificities
among graders indicates inconsistent photograph interpretation skills
or deficient screening guidelines or both. For off-axis photoscreening
as implemented by the MTI system to become a useful vision-screening
method, additional photograph interpretation skill transfer may be ben
eficial, although not necessarily sufficient.