ENHANCEMENT OF THE COSMETIC AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ENUCLEATION WITH THE CONICAL ORBITAL IMPLANT

Citation
Pad. Rubin et al., ENHANCEMENT OF THE COSMETIC AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ENUCLEATION WITH THE CONICAL ORBITAL IMPLANT, Ophthalmology, 105(5), 1998, pp. 919-925
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01616420
Volume
105
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
919 - 925
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(1998)105:5<919:EOTCAF>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Objective: The authors evaluated a new design of a conical-shaped enuc leation implant to help minimize the occurrence of superior sulcus def ects and maximize motility of the prosthesis. The implant shape is a m odification of a sphere. It has a posterior conical projection paralle ling the orbital walls, a superior projection supporting the soft tiss ues of the upper eyelid sulcus, a flattened anterior surface, and chan nels for each rectus muscle. Design: The study design was a consecutiv e case series from the Oculoplastics and Orbital Service of the Massac husetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Intervention/Participants: A total of 4 5 patients (average age, 40 years; range, 13-75 years) had placement o f a conical implant (39 primary enucleations, 6 secondary implants) wi th a minimum of 1 year' follow-up (range, 12-36 months). All of the pr imary enucleations and two of the secondary procedures had the anterio r portion of the implant covered with autologous fascia. Four of the s econdary implants were covered with pseudocapsule harvested from the e xplanted primary implant. Prostheses were fit 6 to 10 weeks after surg ery. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative appearance of patients was a ssessed by qualitative appearance of the superior sulcus and prostheti c motility, and subjectively by patients' satisfaction, Results: A tot al of 43 patients had minimal or no superior sulcus defect, whereas 2 patients had moderate defects. There were no severe sulcus defects. Al l patients were satisfied with their appearance and did not seek furth er surgery to correct any upper sulcus asymmetry. Prosthetic motility with small-angle ductions (<10 degrees) and saccades was good in all c ases. There were two cases of conjunctival wound dehiscence. Both occu rred within 4 weeks of surgery. One wound dehiscence was sutured, wher eas the other healed spontaneously. There were no cases of implant ext rusion, migration, or infection. Conclusion: The conical orbital impla nt provides appropriate reconstitution of orbital volume while minimiz ing superior sulcus defects with adequate prosthetic motility.