J. Mehta et al., SALVAGE AUTOLOGOUS OR ALLOGENEIC TRANSPLANTATION FOR MULTIPLE-MYELOMAREFRACTORY TO OR RELAPSING AFTER A FIRST-LINE AUTOGRAFT, Bone marrow transplantation, 21(9), 1998, pp. 887-892
Forty-two patients allografted for multiple myeloma after not having a
ttained at least a partial remission (n = 19) Or after having experien
ced disease progression (n = 23) following one autograft were compared
with 42 pair-matched controls who underwent salvage autotransplantati
on under identical conditions. Autografted controls were matched close
ly for albumin, C-reactive protein, creatinine, disease sensitivity, d
uration of standard therapy prior to the first transplant, Ig isotype,
karyotype, LDH, and response to the first transplant, but, in compari
son to allografted patients, were older, had higher beta 2-microglobul
in, and had a shorter interval between the two transplants. The comple
te remission rate was 41% after allogeneic and 33% after autologous tr
ansplantation (P = NS). The 3-year probability of event-free survival
was comparable for the two groups (25 +/- 8% after autografting and 20
+/- 8% after allografting). The 3-year probability of survival was si
gnificantly higher after autologous transplantation (54 +/- 8% vs 29 /- 9%; P = 0.01). Twenty-one patients in the autograft group were aliv
e 11-59 months (median 32) following the second transplant, while 15 p
atients in the allograft group were alive at 10-53 months (median 20).
The 3-year probability of disease progression was significantly lower
after allogeneic transplantation (31 +/- 10% vs 72 +/- 9%, P = 0.03).
The 1-year probability of transplant-related mortality was significan
tly higher after allografting (43 +/- 8% vs 10 +/- 5%; P=0.0001). We c
onclude that while autografting appears to be superior to allografting
for salvage therapy of myeloma persisting or relapsing after one prev
ious autotransplant in terms of overall survival, event-free survival
is comparable due to significantly lower disease progression after all
ografting. Reduction in allograft-related toxicity can potentially imp
rove the results of allogeneic transplantation significantly.