J. Mousing et al., MEAT SAFETY CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTING VISUAL POSTMORTEM MEAT INSPECTION PROCEDURES IN DANISH SLAUGHTER PIGS, Veterinary record, 140(18), 1997, pp. 472-477
The consequences of a change from a traditional meat inspection proced
ure, including manual handling, palpation and incision, to an entirely
postmortem meat inspection procedure in Danish slaughter pigs were as
sessed by a comparative study of the two methods in 188,383 slaughter
pigs. Out of 58 lesion codes (selected with a prevalence less-than-or-
equal-to 5.5 x 10(-5)), 26 (45 percent) were assessed either as merely
aesthetic or as the healed stage of an earlier lesion and nine (15 pe
rcent) as active, but local processes, occurring only in non-edible ti
ssue. Five lesion codes (9 percent) were assessed as active, non-absce
ssal processes occurring in edible tissue, caused by swine-specific pa
thogens and 10 (17 percent) were abscessal or pyaemic lesions occurrin
g in edible tissue. Seven lesion codes (12 percent) may be associated
with consumer health hazards (two frequently and five rarely), and one
with occupational health hazards. It was estimated that per 1000 carc
ases, an additional 2.5 with abscessal or pyaemic lesions (in edible t
issue) containing Staphylococcus aureus, 4 x 10(-4) containing ochrato
xin, 0.2 with arthritis due to Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, 0.1 with
caseous lymphadenitis, 7.0 faecally contaminated with Salmonella speci
es, and 3.4 faecally contaminated with Yersinia enterocolitica would r
emain undetected as a result of changing from traditional to the visua
l inspection procedure. Two valuable reasons for implementing a visual
control system are the potential for decreased cross-contamination (n
o handling, cutting and incision) and reduced inspection costs. The re
sources released as a result may be reallocated to hygiene and surveil
lance programmes.