I. Jacoby et al., RETRAINING PHYSICIANS FOR PRIMARY-CARE - A STUDY OF PHYSICIAN PERSPECTIVES AND PROGRAM-DEVELOPMENT, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 277(19), 1997, pp. 1569-1573
Objective.-To determine the number and kinds of programs that medical
schools and managed care organizations offer or plan to offer to retra
in physician specialists to practice primary care medicine and to disc
over physicians' attitudes toward such retraining. Design.-A survey wa
s mailed in 1994 to all 126 medical schools and the 19 largest US mana
ged care organizations to collect detailed information about existing
and potential retraining programs, Physicians' attitudes toward retrai
ning were elicited from participants in 3 geographically diverse focus
groups, Selected specialists were polled through the national survey
of the American Medical Association's Socioeconomic Monitoring System
to ascertain the demand for retraining. Results.-The majority of insti
tutions contacted perceived a need for retraining, but few programs ha
d been established, Programs being ''considered'' varied widely in dur
ation, class size, target audience accreditation, and projected traini
ng settings. Although unenthusiastic about retraining, physicians pref
erred programs that would expand their patient base, maintain the prac
tice population, be inexpensive and close to home, and provide hands-o
n training in the eventual practice environment. Physicians also prefe
rred a goal-oriented, part-time retraining program in a large group pr
actice or managed care setting that would allow them to practice their
specialty while retraining. Few planned or existing programs incorpor
ate many of these features, The most likely candidates for retraining
are subspecialty physicians who currently provide some primary care an
d are employed by a medical plan. Conclusions.-Despite efforts by thos
e who perceive that a need for more generalist physicians is stimulati
ng interest in retraining specialists and subspecialists to provide pr
imary medical care, physician interest and program availability remain
low, and programs under development are not being designed to attract
those who may seek retraining, This situation is probably fortuitous,
because changed perceptions about the adequacy of the generalist phys
ician workforce since the beginning of this study have diminished the
call for retraining.