Amd. Wolf et Jb. Schorling, PREFERENCES OF ELDERLY MEN FOR PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN SCREENING AND THE IMPACT OF INFORMED CONSENT, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 53(3), 1998, pp. 195-200
Background. Use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening
test remains highly controversial, particularly in older men. This stu
dy was undertaken to assess the impact of information on the preferenc
es of older men for such screening. Methods. The elderly cohort (age g
reater than or equal to 65 years) of a larger randomized trial was stu
died to determine the effect of a 3-minute scripted informational inte
rvention on primary care patients' interest in PSA screening and on po
tential predictors of screening interest. Results. Informed patients w
ere significantly less interested in screening than were uninformed pa
tients (p = .006). Informed patients considered PSA screening to be si
gnificantly less efficacious than did uninformed patients (p = .004),
but among both uninformed and informed patients, perceived efficacy co
rrelated with interest in screening (multivariate OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3
.8 for uninformed patients; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.9 for informed patien
ts). Perceived seriousness of prostate cancer predicted interest in sc
reening among uninformed patients (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6), but nor am
ong informed patients. Informed patients who were married were less in
terested in screening than those who were single, divorced, or widowed
(OR 0.3, 95% CI .08-0.9). Marital status did not predict screening in
terest among uninformed patients. Conclusions. Involving elderly patie
nts in the decision whether to screen with the PSA by providing them w
ith information leads to a significant reduction in interest in such s
creening. Factors that appear to influence the screening preferences o
f informed elderly patients include perceived efficacy of screening an
d marital status, whereas uninformed patients are more likely to weigh
the perceived seriousness of prostate cancer in their screening decis
ion.