DOES ARTIFICIAL ENTERAL NUTRITION PROLONG THE SURVIVAL OF INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERS WITH CHEWING AND SWALLOWING PROBLEMS

Citation
Sl. Mitchell et al., DOES ARTIFICIAL ENTERAL NUTRITION PROLONG THE SURVIVAL OF INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERS WITH CHEWING AND SWALLOWING PROBLEMS, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 53(3), 1998, pp. 207-213
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Geiatric & Gerontology","Geiatric & Gerontology
ISSN journal
10795006
Volume
53
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
207 - 213
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-5006(1998)53:3<207:DAENPT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Background. There is a lack of prognostic data regarding tube feeding of institutionalized elderly people. The objective of this study was t o determine the impact of feeding tubes on the survival of nursing hom e residents with chewing and swallowing problems, and to follow the co urse of the tube-fed residents over one year. Methods. We conducted a cohort study with 12-month follow-up using Minimum Data Set resident a ssessments from 1991. Participants included 5,266 nursing home residen ts over the age of 65 with chewing and swallowing problems living in 2 72 Washington state nursing homes. Residents who had a feeding tube we re identified. Baseline clinical characteristics and 12-month survival were compared for residents with and without feeding tubes. The propo rtion of tube-fed residents who became tube-free during the follow-up period was determined, and clinical features that predicted this outco me were examined. Results. Among the residents with chewing and swallo wing problems, 10.5% had a feeding tube. After adjusting for potential confounding covariates, tube-fed residents had a significantly higher one-year mortality rate than those without feeding tubes (risk ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.76). Of the 430 residents with feeding tubes who survived the follow-up period, 25.1% became free of a feeding tube. A ge less than 87 years was associated with a significantly greater like lihood of becoming tube-free (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.03-2.6). Con clusions. Residents selected for feeding tube placement have poorer su rvival after one year than residents who are not tube-fed. However, th e feeding tubes are removed in a significant proportion of residents w ho survive one year. Residents with a potentially reversible condition , for whom the feeding tubes are a temporary intervention, need to be identified.