The strategic elites model of turnout argues that elites mobilize more
when the probability of their effort deciding the electoral outcome i
s greater. Although the literature assumes that this probability depen
ds solely on how close the election is, logically it depends jointly o
n how many votes are needed to affect the outcome (closeness) and on h
ow many additional votes elite efforts are likely to garner (vote yiel
d). Because the vote yield of mobilizational effort varies with the so
cial capital of the district that elites face, the level of elite mobi
lizational effort (hence turnout) should depend interactively on close
ness and social capital. The authors test their predictions using data
from Japanese lower house elections for the years 1967-90. Japan is a
n interesting test case both because its (former) electoral system dif
fers from that for which the model was first developed and because the
literature clearly stresses the role of elite mobilization through so
cial networks but does not examine the particular hypotheses advanced
here.