Evasion and time inconsistency have been prominent concerns in discuss
ions of capital income taxation, both theoretical and applied. This pa
per establishes a link between them, suggesting a potentially useful r
ole for evasion additional to those previously identified: by committi
ng to relatively law enforcement, the government may be able to allevi
ate the welfare loss implied by its inability to commit to the tau rat
e. The scope for this role proves strikingly wide: it is optimal for t
he government to facilitate the evasion of the capital income taxes th
at it chooses to impose whenever the rime consistent tax rate exceeds
that which would be optimal if the government could commit to it.