Jj. Marchalonis et al., AUTOANTIBODIES TO T-CELL RECEPTOR-BETA CHAINS IN HUMAN HEART-TRANSPLANTATION - EPITOPE AND SPECTROTYPE ANALYSES AND KINETICS OF RESPONSE, Experimental and clinical immunogenetics, 13(3-4), 1996, pp. 181-191
Autoantibodies against T-cell receptors have been found in two alloimm
unization situations in humans: renal transplantation and pregnancy. W
e carried out longitudinal studies of human heart transplant recipient
s monitoring their autoantibody production to a recombinant single cha
in T-cell receptor V alpha/V beta construct, a set of nested, overlapp
ing peptides duplicating the complete covalent structure of an individ
ual T-cell receptor beta chain and a set of peptides duplicating the f
irst complementarity determining segments of 24 distinct human V beta
gene products in order to define the time course, epitope specificity
and recognition heterogeneity of the response. Autoantibodies against
intact and peptide-defined V beta and C beta determinants were generat
ed following human heart allotransplantation. The responses generally
show an increase following transplantation that subsequently decreases
with time, a result which is consistent with a single immunization. H
owever, some patients showed elevated responses as long as 12 months f
ollowing the transplant. Autoantibody anti-CDR1 spectrotype analyses d
etected individual differences among patients, but 5 of 8 patients cha
racterized in detail showed elevated IgG binding to CDR1 peptide epito
pes of V beta 6.1, 21.1 and 22.1 gene products. Autoantibodies to CDR1
epitopes of V beta 7.1 and 8.1 were high pretransplant and remained h
igh, although the relative increases with respect to the pretransplant
values were not as impressive as those for the above CDR1 epitopes an
d others usually present in low quantity, e.g. anti-V beta 2.1, 3.1 an
d 24.1. Although there was great disparity between the MHC haplotypes
of donors and recipients, and individual differences among patients, t
he degree of restriction in the autoantibody response was surprising a
nd suggests a common step in recognition and regulation of the respons
e to allografts.