Y. Mochizuki et al., LIMITED REPRODUCIBILITY OF CIRCADIAN VARIATION IN BLOOD-PRESSURE DIPPERS AND NONDIPPERS, American journal of hypertension, 11(4), 1998, pp. 403-409
The relation between blood pressure (BP) variation and hypertensive or
gan damage is controversial. The reproducibility of the circadian vari
ation pattern acceptable as the standard for discriminating between ''
dippers'' and ''nondippers'' has not yet been evaluated. We evaluated
the reproducibility of ''dipper'' and ''nondipper'' patterns in essent
ial hypertensives by monitoring BP for 48 h. Noninvasive ambulatory BP
and heart rate (HR) monitoring for 48 h every 30 min were performed i
n 253 untreated patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
Mean daytime (awake) and nighttime (sleeping) systolic BP, diastolic
BP, and HR values were analyzed by reviewing the patients' diaries. Pa
tients were divided into two groups by presence (dippers) and absence
(nondippers) of a reduction of both systolic and diastolic BP during t
he night of > 10% of the daytime pressure. A subject who was a dipper
on day 1 remained a dipper on day 2 in 41% (n = 103, DD group) and cha
nged to nondipper in 16% (n= 41, DN group). A subject who was a nondip
per on day 1 remained a nondipper on day 2 in 30% (n= 75, NN group) an
d changed to a dipper in 13% (n = 34, ND group). Our findings indicate
that there is a high risk of false-positive or false-negative results
when 24-h recordings are used to identify dipper and nondipper profil
es. (C) 1998 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.