Wt. Pettigrew et Kc. Vaughn, PHYSIOLOGICAL, STRUCTURAL, AND IMMUNOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEAFAND CHLOROPLAST DEVELOPMENT IN COTTON, Protoplasma, 202(1-2), 1998, pp. 23-37
Many of the studies of chloroplast ontogeny in higher plants have util
ized suboptimal conditions of light and growth to assess development.
In this study, we utilized structural, immunological, and physiologica
l techniques to examine the development of the chloroplast in fieldgro
wn cotton (Gossypium hirsutum cv. ''MD 51 ne''). Our youngest leaf sam
ple developmentally was completely folded upon itself and about 0.5 cm
in length; leaves of this same plastochron were followed for three we
eks to the fully expanded leaf. The chloroplasts at the earliest stage
monitored had almost all of the lamellae in small, relatively electro
n-opaque grana, with relatively few thylakoids which were not appresse
d on at least one surface. During the development of the thylakoids, t
he membranes increase in complexity, with considerable stroma lamellae
development and an increase in the number of thylakoids per granum. B
esides the increase in complexity, both the size and numbers of the ch
loroplast increase during the development of the leaf. Developmental c
hanges in six thylakoid proteins, five stromal proteins, and one perox
isomal protein were monitored by quantitative immunocytochemistry. Eve
n at the earliest stages of development, the plastids are equipped wit
h the proteins required to carry out both light and dark reactions of
photosynthesis. Several of the proteins follow three phases of accumul
ation: a relatively high density at early stages, a linear increase to
keep step with chloroplast growth, and a final accumulation in the ma
ture chloroplast. Photosystem-II(PS II)-related proteins are present a
t their highest densities early in development, with an accumulation o
f other parts of the photosynthetic apparatus at a latter stage. The e
arly accumulation of PS-II-related proteins correlates with the much l
ower ratio of chlorophyll a to b in the younger leaves and with the ch
anges in fluorescence transients. These data indicate that some of the
conclusions on chloroplast development based upon studies of intercal
ary meristems of monocots or the greening of etiolated plants may not
be adequate to explain development of chloroplasts in leaves from apic
al meristems grown under natural conditions.