Two visions of homicide, murderers and victims are contrasted. One, co
nventional in criminology, has it that murders are the culmination of
drawn-out, acrimonious transactions occurring within demographically h
omogeneous sectors of the population. It leads to a blurring of moral
identities and causal relations. The other is championed by homicide '
survivors' organizations, and it claims an existentially validated aut
hority. Homicide is experienced by 'survivors' as a chaotic episode wh
ich gives way to strong; antagonistic archetypes of victim and offende
r. The two visions are examined, in part, to promote an appreciation o
f the analytic complexities of the phenomenon of murder; in part, to p
oint to the fraught politics that are beginning to emerge around resol
ving the character of murder.