STIMULATION OF PULMONARY RAPIDLY ADAPTING RECEPTORS BY INHALED WOOD SMOKE IN RATS

Authors
Citation
Cj. Lai et Yr. Kou, STIMULATION OF PULMONARY RAPIDLY ADAPTING RECEPTORS BY INHALED WOOD SMOKE IN RATS, Journal of physiology, 508(2), 1998, pp. 597-607
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223751
Volume
508
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
597 - 607
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3751(1998)508:2<597:SOPRAR>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
1. The stimulation of pulmonary rapidly adapting receptors (RARs) by w ood smoke was investigated. Impulses from seventy RARs were recorded i n fifty-nine anaesthetized, open chest and artificially ventilated rat s; responses to delivery of 6 mi of wood smoke into the lungs were stu died in sixty-one receptors whereas responses to histamine (10 or 100 mu g kg(-1), I.V.) were studied in the other nine. 2. Delivery of wood smoke stimulated fifty-two of the sixty-one RARs studied. When stimul ated, an intense burst of discharge was evoked within 1 or 2 s of smok e delivery This increased activity quickly peaked in 1-3 s (Delta = 15 .8 +/- 1.6 impulses s(-1); n = 61; mean +/- S.E.M), then declined and yet remained at a level higher than the baseline activity. The mean du ration of the stimulation was 25.1 +/- 2.7 s. In contrast, smoke deliv ery did not affect tracheal pressure. 3. Peak responses of RARs to woo d smoke were partially reduced by removal of smoke particulates and we re largely attenuated by pretreatment with dimethylthiourea (DMTU, a h ydroxyl radical scavenger), indomethacin (Indo, a cyclo-oxygenase inhi bitor), or both DMTU and Indo (DMTU + Indo). Conversely, the peak resp onses of RARs were not significantly affected by pretreatment with iso prenaline (a bronchodilator) or vehicle for these chemicals. Additiona lly, pretreatment with DMTU, Indo, or DMTU + Indo did not significantl y alter the RAR sensitivity to mechanical stimulation (constant-pressu re lung inflation; 20 cmH(2)O). 4. Of the nine RARs tested, six were s timulated by histamine and their sensitivity to this chemical irritant was not altered by pretreatment with DMTU + Indo. 5. The results sugg est that both the particulates and gas phases are responsible for, and both the hydroxyl radical and cyclo-oxygenase products are involved i n, the stimulation of RARs by wood smoke. Furthermore, changes in lung mechanics following smoke delivery are not the cause of this afferent stimulation.