Response compatibility effects were assessed with a Stroop-like task w
hich involved arrow and word stimuli. The subjects were required to re
spond to one stimulus-an arrow (e.g., -->) or a word (e.g., left)-and
ignore the other. It was shown that response compatibility played a si
gnificant role in generating Stroop-like interference. Robust interfer
ence effects were observed when the subjects responded manually to wor
d stimuli (ignoring irrelevant arrows) and when they responded vocally
to arrow stimuli (ignoring irrelevant words). Smaller interference ef
fects were observed under response-compatible conditions, namely, resp
onding manually to arrows and vocally to words. In the second experime
nt, within-dimension displays (e.g., arrow-arrow or word-word displays
) yielded a pattern of interference that did not interact with respons
e modality. These findings indicate that both stimulus-response compat
ibility effects and target-distracter similarity are crucial for under
standing Stroop-Like interference.