The importance of canopy and understory competition on white pine (Pin
us strobus L.) seedlings was evaluated in stands with shelterwood trea
tments. We sampled 20 stands in north-central Minnesota that were unde
rplanted with white pine 3 to 10 years before sampling. We grouped the
stands with various canopy and understory treatments into 6 stand typ
es based on residual canopy composition. The effect of the shelterwood
treatments, i.e., residual basal area and understory cover on white p
ine seedling growth varied significantly among the stand types. Loweri
ng basal area had a greater positive impact on seedling growth when sh
ade tolerant softwood species, especially balsam fir (Abies balsemea (
L.) Mill.), were present in the canopy. Where shade tolerant softwood
species were absent, the white pine seedling growth increased only sli
ghtly or not at all in the presence of lowered residual basal area. We
hypothesize that the exclusion of the understory by a shade tolerant
midstory, indicated by the presence of balsam fir, prior to shelterwoo
d treatment coated favorable conditions for white pine in the understo
ry following the shelterwood treatment. The results suggest that shelt
erwood treatments on mesic, more productive hardwood sites should be l
inked to stand development stages where the understory is suppressed,
e.g., following development of a shade tolerant midstory or during the
stem exclusion phase. This method should complement present shelterwo
od prescriptions for drier, low quality hardwood sites. This research
indicates the importance of evaluating both vertical structure and sit
e quality prior to designing white pine shelterwood treatments. (C) 19
98 Elsevier Science B.V.