Pa. Mossey et al., PREDICTION OF LIABILITY TO OROFACIAL CLEFTING USING GENETIC AND CRANIOFACIAL DATA FROM PARENTS, Journal of Medical Genetics, 35(5), 1998, pp. 371-378
Background-Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL(P)) and isolated
cleft palate (CP) are separate clinical entities and for both polygen
ic multifactorial aetiology has been proposed. Parents of children wit
h orofacial clefting have been shown to have distinctive differences i
n their facial shape when compared to matched controls. Objective-To t
est the hypothesis that genetic and morphometric factors predispose to
orofacial clefting and that these markers differ for CL(P) and CP. Me
thods-Polymorphisms at the transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha
) locus in 83 parents of children with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts w
ere analysed, and their craniofacial morphology was assessed using lat
eral cephalometry. Results-Parents of children with CL(P) and CP showe
d an increased frequency of the TGF alpha/TaqI C2 allele (RR=4.10, p=0
.009) relative to the comparison group. Also the TGF alpha/BamHI A1 al
lele was more prevalent in the CP parents. Multivariate statistical an
alysis-Using stepwise logistic regression analysis the TGF alpha/Taq1
C2 polymorphism provides the best model for liability to orofacial cle
fting. To determine the type of clefting a model involving interaction
between the parental TGF alpha/BamHI and TGF alpha/RsaI genotypes sho
wed the best fit. Using genotype only to predict the clefting defect i
n the children according to parental genotype, 68.3% could be correctl
y classified. By adding information on craniofacial measurements in th
e parents, 76% of CP and 94% of CL(P) parents could be correctly class
ified. Conclusions-This study provides a model for prediction of liabi
lity to orofacial clefting, These findings suggest that different mole
cular aberrations at the TGF alpha locus may modify the risk for CP an
d CL(P).