A long-standing but unfounded criticism of the translabyrinthine appro
ach is the misperception that this approach does not give adequate acc
ess to the cerebellopontine angle. Because of what is perceived as lim
ited visualization and operating space within the cerebellopontine ang
le, some surgeons still believe that the translabyrinthine approach is
inappropriate for large acoustic tumors. In this study, the surgical
access to the cerebellopontine angle by virtue of the translabyrinthin
e approach is measured and analyzed. The parameters are compared with
those measured for the retrosigmoid approach. This series objectively
confirms that the translabyrinthine approach offers the neurotologic s
urgeon a shorter operative depth to, the tumor, via a similar-sized cr
aniotomy, This permits superior visualization by virtue of a wider ang
le of surgical access. Such access is achieved with the merit of minim
al cerebellar retraction.