K. Mayura et al., PREVENTION OF MATERNAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY IN RATS VIA DIETARYINCLUSION OF COMMON AFLATOXIN SORBENTS - POTENTIAL FOR HIDDEN RISKS, TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 41(2), 1998, pp. 175-182
In earlier work, we have reported that a phyllosilicate clay (HSCAS or
NovaSil) can tightly and selectively bind the aflatoxins in vitro and
in vivo. Since then, a variety of untested clay and zeolitic minerals
have been added to poultry and livestock feeds as potential ''aflatox
in binders.'' However, the efficacy and safety of these products have
not been determined. A common zeolite that has been frequently added t
o animal feed is clinoptilolite. Our objectives in this study were two
fold: (1) to utilize the pregnant rat as an in vivo model to compare t
he potential of HSCAS and clinoptilolite to prevent the developmental
toxicity of aflatoxin B-2 (AfB(1)), and (2) to determine the effect of
these two sorbents on the metabolism and bioavailability of AfB(1). C
lay and zeolitic minerals (HSCAS or clinoptilolite) were added to the
diet at a level of 0.5% (w/w) and fed to pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats
throughout pregnancy (i.e., day 0 to 20). Treatment groups (HSCAS or c
linoptilolite) alone and in combination with AfB(1) were exposed to so
rbents in the feed as well as by gavage. Untreated and AfB(1) control
animals were fed the basal diet without added sorbent. Between gestati
on days 6 and 13, animals maintained on diets containing sorbent were
gavaged with corn oil in combination with an amount of the respective
sorbent equivalent to 0.5% of the estimated maximum daily intake of fe
ed. Animals receiving AfB(1) were dosed orally (between days 6 and 13)
with AfB(1) (2 mg/kg body wt) either alone or concomitantly with a si
milar quantity of the respective sorbent. Evaluations of toxicity were
performed on day 20. These included: maternal (mortality, body weight
s, feed intake, and litter weights), developmental (embryonic resorpti
ons and fetal body weights), and histological (maternal livers and kid
neys). Sorbents alone were not toxic; AfB(1) alone and with clinoptilo
lite resulted in significant maternal and developmental toxicity. Anim
als treated with HSCAS (plus AfB(1)) were comparable to controls. Impo
rtantly, clinoptilolite (plus AfB(1)) resulted in severe maternal live
r lesions (more severe than AfB(1) alone), suggesting that this zeolit
e may interact with dietary components that modulate aflatoxicosis. In
metabolism studies, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, maintained on die
ts containing 0.5% (w/w) HSCAS or clinoptilolite, were dosed orally wi
th 2.0 mg AfB(1)/kg body wt. The concentration of the major urinary me
tabolite (AfM(1)) was considerably decreased in the presence of HSCAS.
These results suggest that the mechanism of protection of AfB(1)-indu
ced maternal and developmental toxicities in the rat may involve adsor
ption and reduction of AfB(1) bioavailability in vivo. Importantly, th
is study demonstrates the potential for significant hidden risks assoc
iated with the inclusion of nonselective aflatoxin binders in feeds. A
flatoxin sorbents should be rigorously tested individually and thoroug
hly characterized in vivo, paying particular attention to their effect
iveness and safety in sensitive animal models and their potential for
deleterious interactions. (C) 1998 Society of Toxicology.