Dm. Eckman et al., ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT RELAXATION AND HYPERPOLARIZATION IN GUINEA-PIG CORONARY-ARTERY - ROLE OF EPOXYEICOSATRIENOIC ACID, British Journal of Pharmacology, 124(1), 1998, pp. 181-189
1 Acetylcholine (ACh) elicits an endothelium-dependent relaxation and
hyperpolarization in the absence of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandi
n synthesis in the guinea-pig coronary artery (GPCA). This response ha
s been attributed to a factor termed endothelial-derived hyperpolarizi
ng factor (EDHF). Recently it has been suggested that EDHF may be a cy
tochrome P450 product of arachidonic acid (AA) i.e., an epoxyeicosatri
enoic acid (EET). The present study investigated whether this pathway
could account for the response to ACh observed in the GPCA in the pres
ence of 100 mu M N-omega-nitro-L-arginine and 10 mu M indomethacin. 2
ACh, AA and 11,12-EET each produced concentration-dependent relaxation
s in arteries contracted with the H-1-receptor agonist AEP (2,2-aminoe
thylpyridine). The AA-induced relaxation was significantly enhanced in
the presence of the cyclo-oxygenase/lipoxygenase inhibitor, eicosatet
ranynoic acid (30 mu M). 3 The cytochrome P450 inhibitors proadifen (1
0 mu M) and clotrimazole (10 mu M) inhibited ACh, lemakalim (LEM) and
AA-induced relaxation, whereas 17-octadecynoic acid (100 mu M) and 7-e
thoxyresorufin (10 mu M) were without effect on all three vasodilators
. Proadifen and clotrimazole also inhibited ACh (1 mu M) and LEM (1 mu
M)-induced hyperpolarization. 4 The ability of various potassium chan
nel blockers to inhibit relaxation responses elicited with ACh, AA and
11,12-EET was also determined. Iberiotoxin (IBTX; 100 nM) was without
effect on responses to ACh but significantly reduced responses to bot
h AA and 11,12-EET. In contrast, 4-aminopyridine (4-AP; 5 mM) signific
antly reduced response to ACh but not responses to AA and 11,12-EET. C
ombined IBTX plus (4-AP) inhibited the ACh-induced relaxation to a gre
ater extent than 4-AP alone. Apamin (1 mu M), glibenclamide (10 mu M)
and BaCl2 (50 mu M) had no significant effect on responses to ACh, AA
and 11,12-EET. 5 IBTX (100 nM) significantly reduced both 11,12-EET (3
3 mu M) and AA (30 mu M) hyperpolarization without affecting the ACh (
1 mu M)-induced hyperpolarization. In contrast, 4-AP significantly red
uced the ACh-induced hyperpolarization without affecting either AA or
11,12-EET-induced hyperpolarizations. 6 In summary, our results sugges
t that the coronary endothelium releases a factor upon application of
AA which hyperpolarizes the smooth muscle. The similarity of pharmacol
ogy between AA and 11,12-EET suggests that this factor is an EET. Howe
ver, the disparity of pharmacology between responses to ACh versus res
ponses to 11,12-EET do not support the hypothesis that EETs represent
the predominant factor which ACh releases from the endothelium that le
ads to NO-and prostaglandin-independent hyperpolarization and relaxati
on in the GPCA.