The optimal clinical management of minimally invasive (stage T-1) blad
der cancer is controversial, T-1 bladder cancers share characteristics
of both noninvasive (T-a) papillary cancer and high stage, muscle-inv
asive bladder cancers, Patients with T-1 bladder cancer have a higher
risk of cancer progression and death than do patients with T-a bladder
cancer, However, this risk is much lower than that of patients with h
igh-stage bladder cancers, Methods of identifying T-1 bladder cancer p
atients at greatest risk for progression may significantly improve cli
nical management, We retrospectively evaluated two tumor suppressor ge
nes, p53 and RE, as potential prognostic markers for progression in a
cohort of 45 patients with pT(1) bladder cancer, Median follow-up for
these individuals was greater than 3.5 years, Of this group, 58% had a
ltered p53 expression based on positive p53 immunostaining, Three patt
erns for RE nuclear protein staining were observed: absent, heterogene
ous (normal), and strongly homogeneous, Progression-free survival was
similar for patients with loss of RE protein expression and those with
apparent overexpression of RE protein, Therefore, both staining patte
rns were considered abnormal, Patients with normal expression of both
proteins (ie., p53 negative and RE heterogeneously positive) had an ex
cellent outcome, with no patient showing disease progression, whereas
patients with abnormal expression of either or both proteins had a sig
nificant increase in progression (P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively
), These data support the stratification of T-1 bladder cancer patient
s based on p53 and RE nuclear protein status and suggest that patients
with normal protein expression for both genes can be managed conserva
tively, whereas patients with alterations in one and particularly both
genes require more aggressive treatment.