PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 5-FLUOROURACIL VERSUS 5-FLUOROURACIL PLUS LEVAMISOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER - A HOOSIER ONCOLOGY GROUP TRIAL
Mt. Bandealy et al., PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 5-FLUOROURACIL VERSUS 5-FLUOROURACIL PLUS LEVAMISOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER - A HOOSIER ONCOLOGY GROUP TRIAL, Clinical cancer research, 4(4), 1998, pp. 935-939
The purpose of this study was to compare the objective response rate,
duration of remission, and survival of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus th
ose of 5-FU plus levamisole in metastatic colorectal cancer using the
same dose and schedule of these agents as in the North Central Cancer
Treatment Group and intergroup studies of adjuvant therapy, Patients w
ith no prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease were enter
ed on this Hoosier Oncology Group randomized Phase LU trial, Patients
were stratified by Karnofsky performance status and presence or absenc
e of liver metastases, They were randomized to receive 450 mg/m(2) 5-F
U i.v. for 5 days followed by 15 mg/kg i.v. weekly (arm 1) or the same
dose of 5-FU plus levamisole 50 mg p.o. every 8 h for 3 days every 2
weeks (arm 2), The duration of treatment for both arms was 26 weeks, F
rom April 1990 to March 1995, 199 patients were entered, One hundred e
ighty-two patients, 91 in each arm, were fully evaluable. The response
rates were 12%, on arm 1 and 13% on arm 2, The median duration of res
ponse was 18 weeks on both arms, The median survival was 48 weeks on a
rm 1 and 41 weeks on arm 2 (P = 0.20). This study failed to show any i
mprovement in survival, response, or duration of remission with the ad
dition of levamisole to 5-FU in the treatment of metastatic colorectal
cancer.