M. Brautigam, TERBINAFINE VERSUS ITRACONAZOLE - A CONTROLLED CLINICAL COMPARISON INONYCHOMYCOSIS OF THE TOENAILS, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 38(5), 1998, pp. 53-56
Background: Because of the relative clinical inefficacy of antifungal
therapy in the past, onychomycosis has largely been viewed as an incur
able condition. The availability of two new oral antifungal agents sug
gests the possibility of revising this clinical precept. Objective: Th
is study compared the efficacy and tolerability of terbinafine and itr
aconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenails. Methods:
This investigation was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel group stu
dy. The primary therapeutic endpoints measured were mycologic cure and
clinical improvement. Results: Mycologic cure rates (negative culture
and microscopy) at the end of the study were 81% for terbinafine vers
us 63% for itraconazole (2p < 0.01). A total of 92% of terbinafine-tre
ated patients had negative cultures at the end of the study, compared
with 67% of itraconazole-treated patients (2p < 0.0001). Terbinafine w
as more effective than itraconazole in increasing the length of the un
affected area of the target nail: 9.44 mm versus 7.85 mm (2p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Terbinafine is more effective than itraconazole in the tre
atment of toenail onychomycosis.