In this paper the role and value of urodynamic measurements in symptom
atic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients selected for transure
thral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) reviewed. Although pressure-flow
studies alone can diagnose benign prostatic obstruction, the level of
acceptance of urodynamic investigations in BPH remains low, reportedly
due to their cost and to their invasive and time-consuming nature. Fu
rthermore, the observation that extremely different treatment modaliti
es in BPH have nearly the same symptomatic outcome, independently of t
heir influence on obstruction, has played a part in raising doubt as t
o the value of baseline urodynamics as a predictor of clinical success
. Pre-and posttherapy urodynamic investigations in TUMT-treated patien
ts have shown that urodynamic algorithms must be capable of distinguis
hing between compressive and constrictive types of obstruction to docu
ment the limited effects of low-energy TUMT on obstruction. Furthermor
e, it has been shown that urodynamics evaluated in this way seems to b
e the only predictor of the clinical success of TUMT when improvements
in the objective parameters Q(max) (peak uroflow) and residual urine
are included in the definition of outcome.