ENHANCING THE EFFICACY OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER

Authors
Citation
Je. Altwein, ENHANCING THE EFFICACY OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER, Urologia internationalis, 60, 1998, pp. 2-9
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00421138
Volume
60
Year of publication
1998
Supplement
2
Pages
2 - 9
Database
ISI
SICI code
0042-1138(1998)60:<2:ETEORP>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Locally advanced prostate cancer patients comprise those with iatrogen ic capsular injury, extracapsular extension resulting in positive surg ical margins following radical prostatectomy, and tumors with lymph no de metastases, thus representing stage T3,N0,M0 or T1-4,N1-2,M0 diseas e. Parameters can be combined, as shown below, in a nomogram to predic t advanced prostate cancer: if, for example, stage T2c is coupled with a PSA of 16 ng/ml and a high Gleason grade, the patient will have an approximately 70% likelihood of having extracapsular extension: then a gain? if the Gleason score is known from biopsies and a PSA of 10-20 n g/ml is given, then a stage T2c prostate cancer patient with a Gleason of 7 will have a 39% probability of having positive lymph nodes. The following therapeutic considerations may be used to enhance the chance of eradicating advanced disease through radical prostatectomy: (1) Ne oadjuvant hormonal therapy helps downsize the tumor and may eventually reduce the number of positive margins by almost 50%. However, it is a moot point if this will lead to a prolonged survival period. (2) Tech nical refinements on radical prostatectomy may be achieved through the principle of wide extension excision, a modification of current apica l dissection procedures, which involves the use of panoramic magnifyin g loupes, and an examination of resection margins during surgery using repetitive frozen sections. (3) If positive (not simply 'equivocal' a s defined by Epstein) margins are found, radical prostatectomy alone i s not curative. Among the various options available is postoperative i rradiation with or without adjuvant hormonal therapy. The latter shoul d probably be reserved for patients with extracapsular extension, a hi gh Gleason score or positive lymph nodes. Hormonal therapy may be used continuously or intermittently. The value of adjuvant treatment is cu rrently being tested in phase-III trials. (4) Hormonal therapy may be commenced at the time of biochemical or clinical progression, although it is not clear whether this modality is inferior to adjuvant forms o f treatment. Technical expertise in radical prostatectomy accumulated at major institutions can be used to the advantage of patients with lo cally advanced prostate cancer. In this regard, results of ongoing pha se-III trials testing various options including this procedure are eag erly awaited.