Jol. Jorgensen et al., DETERMINANTS OF SERUM INSULIN-LIKE-GROWTH-FACTOR I IN GROWTH-HORMONE DEFICIENT ADULTS AS COMPARED TO HEALTHY-SUBJECTS, Clinical endocrinology, 48(4), 1998, pp. 479-486
OBJECTIVE Growth hormone status is an important determinant of serum I
GF-I but it is well known that hypopituitary adults with pronounced GH
-deficiency (GHDA) may exhibit normal IGF-I levels. To elucidate possi
ble causes of this apparent paradox we compared the significance of pu
tative IGF-I predictors in GHDA and normal subjects. DESIGN A cross-se
ctional study. SUBJECTS Twenty-seven GHDA (9 females, 18 males, mean /- SE age 44 +/- 1 years) and 27 healthy control subjects (9 females,
18 mates, mean +/- SE age 43 +/- 2 years). RESULTS Serum IGF-I and IGF
BP-3 were significantly lower in GHDAs, but a considerable overlap exi
sted (IGF-I (mu g/l) 87 +/- 12 (GHDA) vs 177 +/- 10 (Control) (P < 0.0
01)). In both Controls and GHDA, IGF-I was higher in males than female
s (Control: 196 +/- 12 vs 138 +/- (P = 0.004); GHDA: 97 +/- 16 vs 56 /- 11 (P = 0.05)). In GHDA, males on testosterone substitution had the
highest IGF-I concentrations. The molar IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio was signi
ficantly lower in GHDAs (0.18 +/- 0.01 vs 0.23 +/- 0.02 (P = 0.002)).
IGFBP-1 (mu g/l) was significantly elevated in GHDAs (6.28 +/- 1.11 vs
3.07 +/- 0.32 (P < 0.001)) despite comparable fasting insulin levels.
Percentage total body fat (TBF, DEXA, waist/hip ratio, and intra-abdo
minal fat (CT) were all elevated in GHDAs. IGF-I correlated positively
with lean body mass (DEXA) and negatively with TBF and IGFBP-1 in bot
h groups. IGF-I correlated negatively with age in CON but not in GHDAs
, whereas IGF-I correlated positively with IGFBP-3 only in GHDAs. Mult
iple regression analysis revealed that age and IGFBP-1 were the only s
ignificant predictors of IGF-I in CON, whereas IGFBP-3 and, to a lesse
r extent TBF, were the only independent predictors of IGF-I in GHDAs.
Neither peak stimulated GH, nor physical fitness contributed in any eq
uations in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS 1) IGF-I levels are regulated b
y several variables in addition to GH status 2) age per se is an indep
endent negative determinant in healthy subjects but not in GHDA 3) It
is probable that some cases of paradoxically high IGF-I levels in GHDA
are secondary to inappropriately elevated IGFBP-3 levels. 4) in mid-a
dulthood males have higher IGF-I levels than females and it is likely
that testosterone directly stimulates IGF-I. The influence of gender a
nd sex steroids must therefore be accounted for when comparing IGF-I l
evels between hypopituitary and healthy subjects.