A. Condon et al., ON THE POWER OF FINITE AUTOMATA WITH BOTH NONDETERMINISTIC AND PROBABILISTIC STATES, SIAM journal on computing, 27(3), 1998, pp. 739-762
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Science Theory & Methods",Mathematics,"Computer Science Theory & Methods",Mathematics
We study finite automata with both nondeterministic and random states
(npfa's). We restrict our attention to those npfa's that accept their
languages with a small probability of error and run in polynomial expe
cted time. Equivalently, we study Arthur{Merlin games where Arthur is
limited to polynomial time and constant space. Dwork and Stockmeyer [S
IAM J. Comput., 19 (1990), pp. 1011-1023] asked whether these npfa's a
ccept only the regular languages (this was known if the automaton has
only randomness or only nondeterminism). We show that the answer is ye
s in the case of npfa's with a 1-way input head. We also show that if
L is a nonregular language, then either L or (L) over bar is not accep
ted by any npfa with a 2-way input head. Toward this end, we define a
new measure of the complexity of a language L, called its 1-tiling com
plexity. For each n, this is the number of tiles needed to cover the 1
's in the ''characteristic matrix'' of L, namely, the binary matrix wi
th a row and column for each string of length less than or equal to n,
where entry [x,y] = 1 if and only if the string xy epsilon L. We show
that a language has constant 1-tiling complexity if and only if it is
regular, from which the result on 1-way input follows. Our main resul
t regarding the general 2-way input tape follows by contrasting two bo
unds: an upper bound of polylog(n) on the 1-tiling complexity of every
language computed by our model and a lower bound stating that the 1-t
iling complexity of a nonregular language or its complement exceeds a
function in 2 (Omega(root log n)) infinitely often. The last lower bou
nd follows by proving that the characteristic matrix of every nonregul
ar language has rank n for infinitely many n. This is our main technic
al result, and its proof extends techniques of Frobenius and Iohvidov
developed for Hankel matrices [Sitzungsber. der Konigl. Preuss. Akad.
der Wiss., 1894, pp. 407-431], [Hankel and Toeplitz Matrices and Forms
: Algebraic Theory, Birkhauser, Boston, 1982].