R. Etges et I. Muller, PROGRESSIVE DISEASE OR PROTECTIVE IMMUNITY TO LEISHMANIA-MAJOR INFECTION - THE RESULT OF A NETWORK OF STIMULATORY AND INHIBITORY INTERACTIONS, Journal of molecular medicine, 76(6), 1998, pp. 372-390
Citations number
184
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental","Genetics & Heredity","Medical Laboratory Technology
The study of experimental infection of inbred strains of mice with the
intracellular protozoan parasite Leishmania major has contributed sig
nificantly not only to our understanding of this fascinating host/para
site relationship but also to that of many basic immunological phenome
na. Much has been learned about the cognate interaction of antigen-spe
cific T cells and antigen-presenting cells, about cytokine and T cell
subset regulation, and the requirements for costimulation. Specificall
y, the immune response to experimental L. major infection is the parad
igm for polarized T helper cell (Th) 1 and Th2 differentiation. In thi
s model system a Th1 response characterized by interleukin (IL)-2 and
interferon (IFN)-gamma secretion leads to self-curing disease, whereas
a Th2 response (IL-4, IL-10) leads to nonhealing disease. Numerous ma
nipulations, including the injection of cytokines and of neutralizing
anti-cytokine antibodies, cytokine transgene expression, and more rece
ntly cytokine and cytokine receptor gene knockout studies, have all pr
ovided intriguing new pieces to the still incomplete mosaic of our und
erstanding of the immune response. Some of these findings were clearly
unexpected and are still incompletely understood. For instance, based
on earlier neutralizing anti-IL-4 monoclonal antibody injection studi
es, IL-4 gene-disrupted BALB/c mice were expected to be unable to moun
t the biased Th2 response typical of the IL-4(+/+) wild-type mice and
to he able to control their lesions; quite unexpectedly, the BALB/c IL
-4 knockout mice remain unable to heal their L. major infection. Based
on these unexpected findings, we reexamine the literature in an attem
pt to resolve this apparent paradox and to relate the large body of ex
perimental findings in the mouse system to that which is known about n
atural and experimental infections in the human.