Objective: To provide a simple means of ''real time'' recognition of e
mergence from post-traumatic amnesia (PTA). Methods: Ninety-one patien
ts with traumatic brain injury (PBI); 53 minor (GCS 13-15), 19 moderat
e (GCS 9-12), 18 seven (GCS 3-8), Twenty-seven control subjects treate
d at two regional trauma units for their acute phase and followed in a
hospital-based research institute were studied prospectively. Subject
s were examined repeatedly following injury with the Galveston Orienta
tion and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and tests of their ability to learn and r
etain new information. Word triplets balanced for concreteness and fre
quency were presented. Immediate and 24-hour recall were tested. If 24
-hour recall was imperfect, recognition was tested by presenting the 3
target words and 6 distracters, The target words were then re-present
ed and recall was tested the next day. The time intervals to first per
fect recognition and first free perfect recall were compared with the
patients' first GOAT score of 75 or greater on 2 successive days. Simp
le line drawings of common objects were also presented to the subjects
using an identical paradigm, The outcome measures were GOAT, 3-word r
ecognition and recall, 3 picture recognition and recall. Results: For
all categories of head injury severity, the median interval to perfect
free recall of words followed the achievement GOAT criterion by a sig
nificant interval. The mean GOAT scores for perfect 3-word recall and
recognition corresponding to minor, moderate and severe injuries were
97, 90 and 88, and 97, 76 and 68 respectively, The recognition and rec
all of pictures preceded the recognition and recall of words by approx
imately 1 day. Conclusions: The orientation measures of the GOAT that
contain material that the patient knew prior to injury obscure the det
ermination of recovery of continuous memory and should be tested separ
ately. Three-word recall which is simpler to administer than the GOAT
is a more reliable measure of emergence from PTA. For patients who are
dysphasic or who do not share a common language with the examiner, 3-
picture recognition and recall may substitute for word recognition and
recall.