THE COURSE OF POSTTRAUMATIC AMNESIA - 3 LITTLE WORDS

Citation
Ml. Schwartz et al., THE COURSE OF POSTTRAUMATIC AMNESIA - 3 LITTLE WORDS, Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 25(2), 1998, pp. 108-116
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
03171671
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
108 - 116
Database
ISI
SICI code
0317-1671(1998)25:2<108:TCOPA->2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Objective: To provide a simple means of ''real time'' recognition of e mergence from post-traumatic amnesia (PTA). Methods: Ninety-one patien ts with traumatic brain injury (PBI); 53 minor (GCS 13-15), 19 moderat e (GCS 9-12), 18 seven (GCS 3-8), Twenty-seven control subjects treate d at two regional trauma units for their acute phase and followed in a hospital-based research institute were studied prospectively. Subject s were examined repeatedly following injury with the Galveston Orienta tion and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and tests of their ability to learn and r etain new information. Word triplets balanced for concreteness and fre quency were presented. Immediate and 24-hour recall were tested. If 24 -hour recall was imperfect, recognition was tested by presenting the 3 target words and 6 distracters, The target words were then re-present ed and recall was tested the next day. The time intervals to first per fect recognition and first free perfect recall were compared with the patients' first GOAT score of 75 or greater on 2 successive days. Simp le line drawings of common objects were also presented to the subjects using an identical paradigm, The outcome measures were GOAT, 3-word r ecognition and recall, 3 picture recognition and recall. Results: For all categories of head injury severity, the median interval to perfect free recall of words followed the achievement GOAT criterion by a sig nificant interval. The mean GOAT scores for perfect 3-word recall and recognition corresponding to minor, moderate and severe injuries were 97, 90 and 88, and 97, 76 and 68 respectively, The recognition and rec all of pictures preceded the recognition and recall of words by approx imately 1 day. Conclusions: The orientation measures of the GOAT that contain material that the patient knew prior to injury obscure the det ermination of recovery of continuous memory and should be tested separ ately. Three-word recall which is simpler to administer than the GOAT is a more reliable measure of emergence from PTA. For patients who are dysphasic or who do not share a common language with the examiner, 3- picture recognition and recall may substitute for word recognition and recall.