COCAINE AND SELECTIVE MONOAMINE UPTAKE BLOCKERS (SERTRALINE, NISOXETINE, AND GBR-12935) PREVENT THE D-FENFLURAMINE-INDUCED HEAD-TWITCH RESPONSE IN MICE
Na. Darmani, COCAINE AND SELECTIVE MONOAMINE UPTAKE BLOCKERS (SERTRALINE, NISOXETINE, AND GBR-12935) PREVENT THE D-FENFLURAMINE-INDUCED HEAD-TWITCH RESPONSE IN MICE, Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 60(1), 1998, pp. 83-90
Serotonin release subsequent to 5-HT precursor loading mainly occurs v
ia exocytosis. Acute cocaine or sertraline administration promote the
ability of 5-HT precursors (e.,a. L-tryptophan) to induce the 5-HT2A r
eceptor-mediated head-twitch response (HTR) in rodents. The 5-HT relea
ser, d-fenfluramine, at behaviorally active doses, can induce the head
-twitch response in rodents by releasing cytoplasmic 5-HT via the sero
tonin uptake carrier working in reverse. The purpose of the present st
udy was to utilize the d-fenfluramine-induced HTR to determine the ser
otonergic and nonserotonergic components of cocaine's actions on the d
-fenfluramine-sensitive pool of cytoplasmic 5-HT. Because a dramatic d
ifferential potentiation in HTR frequency is obtained when cocaine is
administered prior relative to after L-tryptophan injection, the effec
ts of varying doses of cocaine and the selective serotonin (sertraline
), dopamine (DA) (GBR 12935), and norepinephrine (NE) (nisoxetine) upt
ake blockers were investigated on the d-fenfluramine-induced behavior
in two experimental protocols. Thus, each uptake inhibitor was adminis
tered either 10 min following (protocol 1) or 10 min prior to (protoco
l 2) d-fenfluramine injection. All the tested uptake inhibitors attenu
ated the d-fenfluramine-induced HTR in a dose-dependent manner in both
experimental protocols. However, their order of potency in either pro
tocol 1 (nisoxetine > GBR 12935 > cocaine > sertraline) or protocol 2
(cocaine > GBR 12935 > nisoxetine = sertraline) does not agree with in
vitro affinity of these drugs for the 5-HT transporter. In addition,
the potency order for cocaine and nisoxetine in protocol 1 was signifi
cantly reversed in protocol 2. The inhibitory effects of the cited dru
gs on the d-fenfluramine-induced HTR are discussed in terms of: 1) hig
h doses of selective monoamine uptake blockers may not exhibit as much
selectivity for their target uptake sites as indicated by in vitro te
sts; and 2) possible pharmacokinetic interactions between d-fenflurami
ne and the monoamine uptake blockers. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.