Gender distinctions as dichotomous categories are perpetuated and main
tained by social mechanisms and are socially constructed. Part of this
social construction is reproduced by many social scientists who adopt
mainstream cultural categories of gender and through theoretical or m
ethodological biases, fail to question them, or who, by their own prac
tices, reinforce them. This analysis is an overview of the epistemolog
ical and methodolical practices that reinforce gender distinctions and
neglect reporting of similarities, Rejecting several models used to e
xplain cultural differences, an alternative mode of analysis-multiplic
ity and proteanism-is proposed as a more productive perspective in the
analysis of gender.