Ha. Degroot et al., IMPLEMENTING THE DIFFERENTIATED PAY STRUCTURE MODEL - PROCESS AND OUTCOMES, The Journal of nursing administration, 28(5), 1998, pp. 28-38
Objective: A salaried Differentiated Pay Structure (DPS) model based o
n the work of Dr.Virginia Cleland was tested on two units. The project
objectives were to: 1) create a budget-neutral compensation distincti
on for different competencies and educational levels; 2) evaluate the
effect of the new salaried model on unit costs and pay; 3) determine t
he effect of the DPS model on job satisfaction, organizational commitm
ent, and anticipated turnover; and 4) assess the impact of professiona
l commitment, professional practice climate, perception of staffing ad
equacy, and dispositional optimism on job satisfaction, organizational
commitment, and anticipated turnover. Background: Although there has
been long-standing interest in salaried models and reward methodologie
s, there is a dearth of systematic research associated with specific c
ompensation models. Methods: A quasi-experimental, non-equivalent cont
rol group design was used to examine the effects of the DPS model. Res
ults: Findings demonstrated that nurses were paid more under the DPS m
odel, and that they were paid for more hours than they actually worked
(N = 68). No difference in job satisfaction was found between experim
ental and control groups. For all nurses (N = 232) dispositional optim
ism was associated with all job satisfaction subscales except pay Orga
nizational commitment, professional commitment, professional practice
climate, and staffing adequacy were also correlated with job satisfact
ion, perceptions of care quality and anticipated turnover. Older nurse
s who had worked longer in nursing, and who had more tenure were less
satisfied with their coworkers and care quality Conclusion: Further lo
ngitudinal research with larger experimental samples is required in or
der to fully understand the effects of the DPS model in nursing.