Background. Acute otitis media is a common disease, particularly among
children. The importance of a correct diagnosis is crucial, especiall
y as unjustified prescription of antibiotics has become a major proble
m in clinical praxis. Objectives. Our aim was to evaluate the predicti
ve value of different otological findings in diagnostics and treatment
of acute otitis media among Gps and ear specialists and to investigat
e if the diagnosis could be improved by the use of an ear microscope i
nstead of an otoscope. Furthermore, we aimed to test the value of foll
owing an algorithm, Methods. Thirty-one patients with otalgia at the E
mergency Department at the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm were exami
ned by both a GP and an ear specialist. The GP used an otoscope, where
as the ear specialist first used an otoscope and then an ear microscop
e. The doctors registered their findings and their proposal for treatm
ent in questionnaires. The ability among participating ear specialists
to give a correct diagnosis was confirmed by the use of 12 video-tape
d selected cases of aural diseases. An algorithm for diagnostics, base
d on medical facts, was formulated and tested. Results. In general, th
e concordance between ear specialists and GPs was satisfactory with re
gard to establishing the diagnosis acute otitis media. The diagnostics
were not improved by use of an ear microscope. The algorithm identifi
ed most patients with acute otitis media. Conclusion. The results indi
cate that the following of a simple algorithm may simplify the decisio
n-making and lead to a correct diagnosis of acute otitis media.