COMPLEX HEALTH-PROBLEMS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - DO WE NEED AN INSTRUMENT FOR CONSULTATION IMPROVEMENT AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT - THEORETICAL FOUNDATION, DEVELOPMENT AND USER EVALUATION OF THE PATIENT PERSPECTIVE SURVEY (PPS)
E. Laerum et al., COMPLEX HEALTH-PROBLEMS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - DO WE NEED AN INSTRUMENT FOR CONSULTATION IMPROVEMENT AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT - THEORETICAL FOUNDATION, DEVELOPMENT AND USER EVALUATION OF THE PATIENT PERSPECTIVE SURVEY (PPS), Family practice, 15(2), 1998, pp. 172-181
Background and objectives. Many patients in general practice present w
ith complex health problems. It is argued that the GP who is in a prim
e position to counsel patients with such problems, will, however, ofte
n perceive a lack of tools to manage them. The aim of the present stud
y was to develop a novel instrument in terms of a patient-administered
questionnaire, the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS), designed to enha
nce the quality of clinical communication in the consultation. It is b
ased on a biopsychosocial patient perspective, patient centredness, pa
tient resources, involvement and coping, and quality of life orientati
on. Methods. Development of the PPS has included comprehensive literat
ure research, discussions and advice, during several phases, from grou
ps of GPs, patients, broad panels of experts and testing in pilot stud
ies. After many revisions, a 102-item version, consisting of a main so
matic, mental and social domain axis, was evaluated by GPs and patient
s in 213 consultations. Results. The basic idea, theoretical elements
and purpose of the PPS appeared in general to be well accepted. Sevent
y-five to eighty-five per cent of the patients found the questions rel
evant and easy to understand and there were high positive scorings reg
arding influence on the doctor-patient relationship, communication, re
source and coping aspects, occurrence of new information and general s
atisfaction with the consultation. Similar scorings were obtained from
the GPs' evaluation. Both parties agreed that there is a need for a s
horter and more specific PPS version, and that the resource and coping
dimension should be even more extended. Conclusions. We consider it w
ell documented that there is a need for this new instrument to deal wi
th complex health problems in general practice, and that it has promis
ing potentials for consultation improvement.