The main objective of this paper is to study the relationship between
codification and appropriability. Both codification and appropriabilit
y are not interpreted here as discrete variables, but as describing a
range of possible situations, from the completely tacit to the complet
ely codified, and similarly for appropriability. It is argued that the
degree of codification increases with the age and maturity of a disci
pline/research tradition. Appropriability is found to depend on: (a) t
he degree of codification, (b) the fraction of the population of agent
s knowing the code, and (c) the distribution of knowledge among the ag
ents who are potential users of knowledge. Thus, we can expect the int
rinsic appropriability of a discipline/research tradition to fall both
with the degree of codification, which increases with the maturity of
the discipline/research tradition, and with the fraction of the popul
ation of agents knowing the code. Such tendency can be counteracted by
the strategies of some agents attempting to advance the knowledge fro
ntier fast enough to leave behind other agents. The analysis contained
in this paper refers only to the internal or intrinsic appropriabilit
y of a discipline/research tradition. However, the appropriability of
a discipline/research tradition can be raised by other means, for exam
ple, by combining what could be considered the core knowledge of an or
ganization with complementary assets (e.g., legal, marketing, financia
l competencies, etc). Such further mechanisms of creation of appropria
bility are not studied in this paper. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier S
cience B.V.