Ca. Bifano et al., PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF HYDROXYAPATITE CEMENT AS AN AUGMENTATION DEVICE IN THE EDENTULOUS ATROPHIC CANINE MANDIBLE, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 85(5), 1998, pp. 512-516
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Objective. The purpose of this study was to answer the following two q
uestions: (1) Can hydroxyapatite cement in combination with deminerali
zed freeze dried bone feasibly augment the dimension of an atrophic ed
entulous canine mandible? (2) What is the histologic fate of an augmen
tation graft composed of hydroxyapatite cement and demineralized freez
e dried bone placed on the surface of an atrophic edentulous canine ma
ndible? Study Design. Each of four mixed-breed canines (weighing 50 to
60 pounds) underwent bilateral mandibular dental extraction (canine t
o second molar) and radical alveolectomy. After 4 months of healing, a
bilateral subperiosteal mandibular augmentation graft was put into pl
ace, with hydroxyapatite cement/demineralized freeze dried bone on the
surface of one hemimandible and porous granular hydroxyapatite and de
mineralized freeze dried bone on the surface of the other hemimandible
. The animals were killed after functioning on a soft diet for 9 month
s, and the grafted hemimandibles were harvested. Results. Both hydroxy
apatite cement and granular hydroxyapatite grafts appeared to augment
the edentulous atrophic canine mandible. On histologic exam, the hydro
xyapatite cement grafts showed osteoconduction and subperiosteal and e
ndosteal osteonal bone formation, whereas the granular hydroxyapatite
grafts showed only osteoconduction. Neither graft material showed chro
nic or acute inflammation. Conclusion. Hydroxyapatite cement can funct
ion feasibly as a mandibular augmentation device. The histologic fate
of hydroxyapatite cement is different from that of granular hydroxyapa
tite. It has a fate comparable to autogratt or allograft cortical bone
grafts.