COMPARISON OF THE PARASIGHT(TM)-F TEST AND THE ICT MALARIA PF(TM) TEST WITH THE POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PLASMODIUM-FALCIPARUM MALARIA IN TRAVELERS

Rapid and accurate methods are needed for the diagnosis of imported ma laria. The ParaSight(TM)-F test and the ICT Malaria Pf(TM) test are co mmercially available kits marketed for the diagnosis of Plasmodium fal ciparum malaria. Both tests are antigen-capture assays based on the de tection of falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 in peripheral blood. Us ing microscopy and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method as r eference standards, we performed a 'blinded' comparison of these assay s for the detection of P. falciparum infection in 200 febrile travelle rs returning from malaria-endemic areas. As determined by PCR and micr oscopy, 148 travellers had malaria and, of these patients, 54.7% (81/1 48) were infected with P. vivax only, 31.1% (46/148) with P. falciparu m only, 9.5% (14/148) with P. ovale, 0.7% (1/148) with P. malariae, an d 4.1% (6/148) had mixed infections. Compared to PCR, the ParaSight(TM )-F and ICT Malaria Pf(TM) tests had initial sensitivities of 94% and 90% and specificities of 95% and 97%, respectively, for the detection of P. falciparum malaria. When discrepant samples were retested with d ay 0 and day I bloods, the sensitivities improved to 96% and 94%, resp ectively. The 2 remaining false negative results with the Para-Sight(T M)-F test and 2 of the 3 false negative results with the ICT Malaria P f(TM) test occurred in samples with <100 parasites/mu L. The performan ce of these kits was not significantly different (P=0.75) and both are simple, rapid, and accurate tests for the detection of P. falciparum infection in the returned traveller.