BICALUTAMIDE IN ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - A REVIEW

Authors
Citation
Kl. Goa et Cm. Spencer, BICALUTAMIDE IN ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - A REVIEW, Drugs & aging, 12(5), 1998, pp. 401-422
Citations number
110
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Geiatric & Gerontology
Journal title
ISSN journal
1170229X
Volume
12
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
401 - 422
Database
ISI
SICI code
1170-229X(1998)12:5<401:BIAP-A>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with a long elimination ha lf-life (t 1/2) that permits once-daily administration. When combined with a gonadorelin (gonadotrophin releasing hormone; GnRH) agonist in maximum androgen blockade (MAB) regimens, bicalutamide 50mg once daily is at least as effective as flutamide 250mg 3 times daily, as shown i n a large randomised trial. Rate of treatment failure, the primary end -point, was significantly lower at 49 weeks with bicalutamide in this study, mainly because of a lower rate of withdrawal due to adverse eve nts. Final results at a median follow-up of 160 weeks revealed longer median times to progression and death with bicalutamide than flutamide , but between-group differences were not significant overall. Although early trials demonstrated clinical benefits with bicalutamide 50 mg/d ay as monotherapy, the drug in this dosage is less effective than cast ration. Increasing the dosage to 150 mg/day has improved its efficacy in patients with non-metastatic disease: combined data from 2 trials d emonstrate similar survival with bicalutamide in this dosage compared with castration. Accumulating evidence from these and other studies in dicates that sexual interest appears to be better preserved with bical utamide than with castration. The tolerability profile of bicalutamide is characteristic of antiandrogens, with breast pain and gynaecomasti a occurring most often. Bicalutamide has not been causally associated with problems such as interstitial pneumonitis and difficulty with lig ht/dark adaptation seen with nilutamide, and in a 50 mg/day dosage cau ses a lower incidence of diarrhoea than flutamide 750 mg/day. Changes in hepatic function are generally transient and resolve or improve dur ing therapy or after bicalutamide treatment is withdrawn. Conclusion. Bicalutamide, with its once-daily regimen and good tolerability, is an attractive option when combined with a GnRH agonist in patients with advanced prostate cancer who are suitable to receive MAB regimens. The role of bicalutamide as monotherapy in the management of this common malignancy is currently being assessed.