Ea. Pinkard et Cl. Beadle, REGULATION OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN EUCALYPTUS NITENS (DEANE AND MAIDEN) MAIDEN FOLLOWING GREEN PRUNING, Trees, 12(6), 1998, pp. 366-376
Green pruning was used to induce source limitation in 1-year-old Eucal
yptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden plants in an investigation of r
egulation of net CO2 assimilation (A). The pruning regimes involved re
moval of 0, 50% or 70% of the length of green crown, equivalent to 0,
78% or 95% of leaf area respectively. Gas exchange measurements were m
ade on fully-expanded leaves at 80% of crown height prior to pruning,
and at weekly intervals over the 8 weeks following pruning. An increas
e in A was observed in response to pruning a week after treatment. In
50%-pruned plants this increase in A was observed for 6 weeks, but in
70%-pruned plants it was still evident at the end of the experiment. W
hile leaf conductance (g) increased considerably following pruning, st
omatal limitation was unaffected, indicating that the most important c
hanges in conductance of CO2 were in the mesophyll. Both carboxylation
efficiency (C-e) and RuBP regeneration capacity (V-j) increased follo
wing pruning. The magnitude and duration of changes increased with pru
ning severity. There was evidence that A was primarily limited by V-j,
although in 70%-pruned plants C-e may have been the main limitation e
arly in the experiment. The response of A to low p(O-2) indicated that
A was not limited by rates of triose phosphate utilisation (TPU), and
that, at more severe pruning levels, rates of TPU may have increased
in the short term. Apparent quantim yield was unaffected by pruning, s
uggesting no change in the production or consumption of ATP or NADPH(2
). There was a negative linear relationship between A and the ratio of
leaf area to aboveground dry mass, and a positive linear relationship
between A and specific leaf area. Both suggested a link between rates
of assimilation of the level of source limitation. The capacity of E.
nitens to regulate photosynthesis in response to pruning increases th
e potential for maintaining a balance between assimilation and utilisa
tion of carbon, thereby mimimising the impact of pruning on growth. Ho
wever there will be a level of source limitation at which photosynthes
is is limited by the rate of one or more biochemical reactions, and ab
ove which complete compensation is not possible. At such levels growth
will usually be affected. In this experiment diameter growth was slig
htly reduced by 50%-pruning, but both height and diameter increment we
re substantially reduced by 70%-pruning.