There is great controversy concerning the need to phase out methyl bro
mide (MeBr) to protect stratospheric ozone. Unlike chlorinated hydroca
rbons, MeBr occurs naturally in the atmosphere making it difficult to
differentiate the threat to stratospheric ozone depletion from anthrop
ogenic use of MeBr compared to natural sources. New technology has bee
n developed which could nearly eliminate MeBr emissions from soil fumi
gation, bringing into question the need for a phase out. A field exper
iment demonstrated that virtually impermeable films (VIF) reduced MeBr
emissions to near-zero levels. When compared to soil fumigation using
conventional high-density polyethylene film (HDPE), the total global
MeBr emission could be reduced from 32 Gg/yr to less than 1 Gg/yr, if
VIF were required. In addition, reduced application rates are possible
since using VIF reduces wasteful leakage and increases pest-control e
fficiency. With such low emission rates, and considering the large unc
ertainty in global estimates of MeBr, it seems that the phase-out of M
eBr as a soil fumigant is unjustified.