C. Sabot et al., BAYESIAN PHARMACOKINETIC ESTIMATION OF VINORELBINE IN NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 54(2), 1998, pp. 171-175
Objective: To develop a population pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine in
a population of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using a Ba
yesian estimation in order to calculate for any further patient. indiv
idual pharmacokinetic parameters from few blood samples. Methods: Vino
relbine was given by a 15-min infusion (30 mg.m(-1)) to eight patients
with NSCLC. Its serum concentration was determined by HPLC and its ph
armacokinetics was described by a three-compartment open model with el
imination from the central compartment. Volume of the central compartm
ent (V-1) and rate constants (k(10), k(12), k(21), k(13), k(31)) were
selected as population pharmacokinetic parameters and computed by non-
linear regression (two-step approach) from 14 to 18 concentration meas
urements per course. Subsequently, these parameters were used by the B
ayesian estimator to calculate individual pharmacokinetics from only 2
or 3 measured concentrations. Results: The population mean values (CV
%) of V-1, k(10), k(12), k(21), k(13), k(31), CL, t(1/2 gamma) were re
spectively 21 1(55%). 3.2 h(-1) (29%), 7.7 h(-1) (74%), 1.3 h(-1) (67%
), 4.7 h(-1) (53%). 0.04 h(-1) (20%), 57 1.h(-1) (31%) and 43 h (36%).
The comparison of results obtained from the Bayesian estimator and fr
om the three-compartment model showed that CL and t(1/2 gamma) were we
ll predicted (relative deviation: +/- 12 to 22%) by the Bayesian metho
d using only two blood samples. Conclusion: We demonstrated that Bayes
ian estimation allows, at minimal cost and minimal disturbance for the
patient, the determination of several vinorelbine pharmacokinetic par
ameters and therefore dose adaptation from as few as two drug concentr
ations, measured at 6 h and 24 h after infusion.