In this study, four different solar driers were tested under field con
ditions in St. Lucia to demonstrate their ability to reduce the moistu
re content of cocoa beans (Theobroma Cocoa L.) to a level not requirin
g subsequent polishing. An indirectly heated solar drier (ISD) coupled
with a flat-plate collector and a direct solar drier (DSD) were compa
red with open air sun drying on perforated steel (OAS) and non-perfora
ted wooden surfaces (OAW). The ability of each method to reduce cocoa
beans to safe storage moisture levels (<8% wb) for loading capacities
of 13.7 and 40.4 kg/m(2) were compared. Temperature rises were 15 and
20 degrees C above ambient in the ISD and DSD, respectively. The drier
s were more efficient in removing moisture throughout the drying proce
ss at the lower loading capacity of 13.7 kg/m(2) and particularly duri
ng the initial stages of drying. Sun drying on a wooden surface proved
more effective than other methods at 13.7 kg/m(2) loading in the fina
l stages of drying. Although the ISD performed better at the higher lo
ading capacity, its cost and the short season for cocoa harvest makes
it prohibitive for all but the largest producers. The DSD, while less
efficient in drying cocoa beans, costs only about twice as much as ope
n air driers and it has the advantage of not requiring labor to cover
the beans during rainfall.