IMPORTANCE OF A RELIABLE ADMISSION GLASGOW COMA SCALE SCORE FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR EVACUATION OR POSTTRAUMATIC SUBDURAL HEMATOMAS - APROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 65 PATIENTS
F. Servadei et al., IMPORTANCE OF A RELIABLE ADMISSION GLASGOW COMA SCALE SCORE FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR EVACUATION OR POSTTRAUMATIC SUBDURAL HEMATOMAS - APROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 65 PATIENTS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 44(5), 1998, pp. 868-873
Background: Patients who have an acute subdural hematoma with a thickn
ess of 10 mm or less and with a shift of the midline structures of 5 m
m or less often can be treated nonoperatively. We wonder whether the k
nowledge of the clinical status both in the prehospital determination
and on admission to the neurosurgical center can predict the bleed for
evacuation of subdural hematomas as well as the computed tomographic
(CT) parameters. Methods: From January 1, 1994, to May 31, 1996, 65 co
matose patients harboring an acute subdural hematoma of 5 mm or more a
nd not brain dead were admitted to our intensive care unit, Of the 65
patients, 15 patients were initially managed conservatively according
to a protocol based on clinical, CT, and intracranial pressure paramet
ers. During the study period, the use of long-lasting paralytic agents
has been eliminated to allow detection of clinical deterioration in t
he Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score from the prehospital determination t
o the hospital admission assessment. Results: Of the 15 patients initi
ally managed conservatively, two were subsequently operated on because
of evolving parenchymal hematomas. When comparing demographic, clinic
al, and CT parameters between the surgical group of patients and the p
atients initially conservatively treated, hematoma thickness (mean, 17
.1 mm vs. 7.5 mm, p < 0.0001) and shift of the midline structures (mea
n, 12.8 mm vs. 4.7 mm, p < 0.008) were predictive of the need for surg
ery. A statistically significant change in the GCS score between preho
spital determination and admission assessment was shown in the surgica
l group of patients (mean GCS score, 8.4 vs. 6.7, p < 0.01), and it wa
s not present (mean GCS score, 7.3 vs, 7.2) in the patients initially
conservatively treated, Functional outcomes were present in 23 cases (
35.4%); functional outcomes in the initially conservatively treated pa
tients were reached by 10 patients (66.7%). Conclusions: Nonoperative
management for selected cases of acute subdural hematomas is at least
as safe as surgical management. GCS scoring at the scene and in the em
ergency room combined with early and subsequent CT scanning is crucial
where making the decision for nonoperative management. This strategy
requires that administration of long-lasting sedatives and paralytic m
edications be avoided before the patient arrives at the neurosurgical
center.