T. Staudinger et al., DIAGNOSTIC VALIDITY OF PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERIZATION FOR RESIDENTSAT AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 44(5), 1998, pp. 902-906
Objective: To assess the amount of additional information provided by
measurements derived from pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use beyond t
hat derived from clinical evaluation by intensive care residents. Meth
ods: One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients undergoing right-hear
t catheterization were prospectively included in the study, Before ins
erting a PAC, physicians had to predict pulmonary arterial pressure (P
AP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systemic vascular resi
stance index (SVRI), cardiac index (CI), mixed venous oxygen saturatio
n (SVO2), oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen consumption (VO2), and pulmona
ry shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) by selecting a given option on a questionnai
re. Ranges of options mere chosen to create clear clinical differences
among them. Results: The correct value was predicted in a median of 5
0% of cases (range, 45-63%). PAP was predicted correctly in 55%, PCWP
in 46%, SVRI in 63%, CI in 62%, SVO2 in 45%, DO2 in 45%, VO2 in 51%, a
nd Qs/Qt in 51%. A significant difference was found between estimated
and measured values for all parameters (p < 0.01). No significant diff
erences were detected between more and less experienced physicians. Th
ere was no significant difference between estimated and measured value
s with respect to the different courses of intensive care unit admissi
ons or the different indications for PAC insertion, Conclusion: In a s
elected group of critically ill patients, the PAC adds valuable and cl
inically relevant information to clinical assessment in about 50% of c
ases, Its use should not be withheld ira patients with unclear hemodyn
amic and metabolic profiles.