Cost-effectiveness analysis, an analytic tool that expresses as a rati
o the cost of obtaining an additional unit of health outcome, can help
decision makers achieve more health protection for the same or less c
ost. We characterize the state of the cost-effectiveness analysis lite
rature by reviewing how this technique is applied to various clinical
and public health interventions. We describe the results of cost-effec
tiveness analyses for over 40 interventions to reduce cancer, heart di
sease, trauma, and infectious disease. The cost-effectiveness ratios f
or these interventions vary enormously, from interventions that save m
oney to those that cost more than $1 million per year of life gained.
The methods used to derive the cost-effectiveness ratios also vary con
siderably, and we summarize this variation within each health area. Gr
eater uniformity of analytical practice will be necessary if cost-effe
ctiveness analysis is to became a more influential tool in debates abo
ut resource allocation.