Clinical research in surgery is critisized now and than throughout the
world because of its deficits in controlled clinical trials, the redu
ced spectrum of its clinical study types, and its methodological flaws
. German surgery, however, has always shown reasonable standing in suc
h areas of conflict by following a separate path: integration of clini
metric and biomedical reseach, Europeanizing clinical trials, clinical
research in quality management and clinical practice guidelines, and
installation of social psychology as basic science into outcome resear
ch. This separate path - in contrast to surgery in the U.S. - should,
indeed, be followed insistently.