E. Neugebauer et al., STATUS OF PERIOPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PAIN IN GERMANY - RESULTS OF A REPRESENTATIVE AND ANONYMOUS SURVEY OF 1,000 SURGICAL CLINICS, Chirurg, 69(4), 1998, pp. 461-466
To evaluate the status of perioperative pain management we mailed a an
onymous postal survey to all 2,254 surgical departments in Germany. We
received answers from 1,000 clinics (44.4%) which were representative
related to their regional distribution. We asked the responsible surg
eons to report their organizational structure and responsibilities for
treating pain patients, the significance of the problem, their method
s of measuring pain, and the usage of different analgesic drugs and me
thods. In 47% the surgeon and the anesthesist together had responsibil
ity for adequate postoperative pain treatment; in 33% and 14%, respect
ively, it was the surgeon and anesthesist alone. Only 41% knew the int
erdisciplinary statement on pain therapy of the Professional Societies
of German Surgeons and Anaesthesists from 1992. Although the importan
ce of postoperative pain is globally acknowledged, only 19.1% of all d
epartments had a written concept for pain treatment. Pain was measured
in only 11% of the clinics mainly by using the visual analogue scale.
Most surgeons relieve pain solely with systemic drugs. Regional analg
esia was used by 18% only. 51% of the surgeons decide on the choice an
d dosage of analgesic therapy on the ward; 33% admit that pain therapy
often starts after complaints of the patient. 70% of all surgeons nev
er participated in a congress on pain. We conclude that postoperative
pain management in most German surgical departments still lacks effect
iveness, adequacy, and organizational and scientific background.