T. Gillart et al., COMBINED NITRIC-OXIDE INHALATION, PRONE POSITIONING AND ALMITRINE INFUSION IMPROVE OXYGENATION IN SEVERE ARDS, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 45(5), 1998, pp. 402-409
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and side effects of prone positioni
ng (PP) and nitric oxide (NO) inhalation alone, associated, or combine
d with iv almitrine for the treatment of hypoxaemia in severe acute re
spiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Over a period of 20 month
s, 27 consecutive critically in patients with severe ARDS (Murray scor
e > 2.5, PaO2/FiO(2) < 170 after alveolar recruitment) were prospectiv
ely and randomly included. They inhaled NO for two hours at concentrat
ions of 5 and 10 ppm for one hour each (H0-H2). One hour later they we
re returned to the prone position for four hours (H3-H7). During the l
ast two hours in this position (H5-H7), they were assigned to further
inhalation of 10 ppm NO (Group B, n = 9) or to no further inhalation (
Group A, n = 9), in group C (n = 9), the procedure for group B was com
bined with perfusion of 16 mg.kg(-1).min(-1) almitrine throughout the
study. Results: Compared with control values, two hours NO inhalation
improves PaO2/FiO(2) and shunt effect by +28% and -9%, PP by +88% and
-27%, PP + almitrine by +132% and -28%, NO + almitrine by +153 and -28
%, PP + NO by +94% and -29%, NO + PP + almitrine by +327 and -48%. NO
inhalation reduces pulmonary vascular resistance. Other haemodynamic p
arameters remain unchanged, whatever the treatment, NO inhalation impr
oves PaO2/FiO(2), by over 20% in 50% of the patients and PP is effecti
ve in 78% of the cases. Conclusion: Prone Position improves PaO2/FiO(2
) significantly more than NO alone but less than PPS almitrine or NOalmitrine. The best results are obtained with the association of NO Prone position + Almitrine.