The feasibility of adopting a consistent approach to the expression of
uncertainties relating to identification is discussed. It is argued t
hat qualitative analysis,can be viewed as a classification problem, th
at it is at least as important as quantitative analysis and that infer
ences drawn from qualitative tests should take relevant uncertainties
into account. A brief review of systems of reasoning under uncertainty
is presented, and it is concluded that Bayes' theorem provides the mo
st suitable framework, providing for combination of separate items of
evidence and implicitly allowing for both false positive and false neg
ative probabilities in a single parameter. The chemical significance a
nd practical evaluation of relevant probabilities are considered, and
the applications and reporting of 'identification certainty' figures a
re discussed.