Quality of life has been increasingly used as a scientific concept in
literature embracing a wide range of target groups and populations as
a whole. Conceptualizations vary, but there is much common ground conc
erning the domain content embraced by the term. Commentators are also
clear that account needs to be taken of both objective life conditions
and subjective personal appraisals,and the fact that what is importan
t to each person varies. A synthesis of these perspectives provides a
model of quality of life which integrates objective and subjective ind
icators and individual values across a broad range of life domains. Li
fe domain issues may be categorized within six areas: physical, materi
al, social, productive, emotional and civic well-being. Whatever its p
recise specification, the model is put forward as a framework for orga
nizing measurement relevant to the quality of life concept rather than
as a blueprint for deriving the ultimate single instrument. There is
still a need for methodological flexibility. The pre-eminent aim is to
relate the fine grain of the experience of individuals with disabilit
y to that of the wider world.